Differentiation Rules
show answer
correct answer: A
worked solution
Fundamentals of Modern Mathematics 1
cutline’s math130 bank is being built lecture by lecture across the otago fundamentals of modern mathematics course. it covers calculus and linear algebra with the full worked method shown, matching the working-marked style math130 actually assesses, and you can start free without a card.
Published MCQs: 854. Worksheets and mock exams: 20.

A public sample. Your selection stays on this page and is not saved to an account.
Differentiation Rules
correct answer: A
worked solution
Continuity and the Intermediate Value Theorem
correct answer: A
worked solution
The Definite Integral and Area
correct answer: A
worked solution
The Dot Product
correct answer: A
worked solution
Teaching practice and mock exams currently listed for this paper.
Active products only. Published worksheets in visible groups, with unrestricted multiple-choice questions. Retired questions, module tests and written questions are excluded. This does not measure whole-course coverage or concept articles.
This catalogue is cached. The app rechecks access before you start.
These are paper topics, not a list of published worksheets.
math130 is introductory and, like stat, a genuinely nice paper once you get going. the one difference is that it is not all multi-choice, some answers need working shown and that working gets marked, so practising the method matters, not just landing the final answer. the bank here is built around that, working through problems the way the exam wants them.
these are established findings, not fringe claims, and recent reviews keep confirming them (Carpenter et al., 2022; Weinstein et al., 2018). the emphasis here is on the higher-order skill of applying and transferring ideas to unseen questions, which is what separates the top HSFY grades and the study habits medicine selects for.
math130 is an approachable introductory paper covering calculus and linear algebra, with one important difference from a pure multiple-choice paper: it marks your working, not just the final answer. the methods below train both the selection skill and the disciplined method the exam rewards.
the classic interleaving experiment was run on mathematics problems: students who shuffled problem types learned to tell them apart and outperformed students who practised in blocks, despite the blocked group feeling more confident during study (Rohrer & Taylor, 2007). math130 is the exact setting that research describes.
the paper deliberately weaves together calculus, linear algebra and geometry, so blocked practice lets you coast on knowing which technique the chapter wants. a mixed set forces you to look at a fresh problem and decide whether it needs differentiation, a matrix operation, or a geometric argument, which is the real exam skill and the one blocked practice hides. (Rohrer & Taylor, 2007; Brunmair & Richter, 2019)
try it: make a set that alternates a derivative, a matrix operation and a geometry question rather than a page of one kind.
because math130 marks method and not only the answer, the useful feedback is about where your reasoning breaks, not merely whether you were right. effective feedback identifies the gap and how to close it, which drives more improvement than a bare right-or-wrong (Hattie & Timperley, 2007).
practise by writing out every step of a solution as if it were being marked, then compare against a worked solution to find the exact line where your logic slipped, a sign error, a skipped justification, a misapplied rule. fixing the specific step is far more valuable than noting that the final number was wrong, and it directly protects the method marks the exam awards. (Hattie & Timperley, 2007)
try it: write out every step, then compare against the worked solution to find the exact line where your reasoning slipped.
peeking at the solution early feels smooth and fast, but that fluency is misleading: struggling with a problem first is a desirable difficulty that makes the method stick better than reading someone else’s working (Bjork & Bjork, 2011).
give each math130 problem a genuine attempt before opening the answer, and use the answer only to check and correct. the productive struggle is where the learning happens, and it also builds the independent problem-solving the paper is designed to develop. (Bjork & Bjork, 2011)
try it: give each problem a genuine attempt before opening the answer, then use the answer only to check.
the difference between a good and a top math130 grade is usually the ability to apply a method to a problem you have not seen, and to combine ideas, rather than to reproduce a memorised solution. varied retrieval practice builds this transfer, the flexible application of a method to new situations (Pan & Rickard, 2018; Carpenter et al., 2022).
deliberately work unfamiliar and combined problems, a question that needs both calculus and a matrix step, for instance, rather than repeating drills of the same form. because math130 marks method, practising how to apply and justify a technique on a novel problem is exactly what earns the higher marks. (Pan & Rickard, 2018; Carpenter et al., 2022)
try it: work a problem that combines two techniques or applies a method in an unfamiliar form, showing your full method.
the spacing effect is why flashcards work: revisiting a fact just as you are about to forget it locks it in far better than cramming (Cepeda et al., 2006). anki is the tool most health-science students reach for, and it is genuinely good. flashcards suit the definitions and rules; pair them with worked-problem practice, since math130 also marks method. cutline pairs anki-style flashcards for the raw facts with a qbank of exam-style math130 questions, so you can drill what needs memorising and then practise applying it.
the bank is being built out lecture by lecture, so this page updates as more content is published.
yes, every sample question includes a full worked solution, not just the final answer.
the study methods above come from established research in cognitive and educational psychology.
Cutline operates independently and is not affiliated with, employed by, or endorsed by the University of Otago.